DOP 5: Delete One Part official App Store screenshot
Official App Store screenshot. Not a playtest capture.

Home / Reviews / erase-riddle / DOP 5: Delete One Part

FULL REVIEW REVIEW DIGEST

DOP 5: Delete One Part review

DOP 5 has an understandable comic-riddle appeal, with real supporters of its erasing mechanic. Advertising friction and reported content concerns are substantial caveats, especially for families.

PLATFORMiOS
APP VERSION1.1.53
TESTEDNot playtested
TESTER REGIONUS
STORE CHECKEDUS App Store

Opens the official store and leaves this site. Kids: ask a grown-up before buying anything.

Player-review analysis, not a playtest. Sources: the US App Store listing and 50 US reviews dated 2026-10-26–2026-11-09 (Asia/Shanghai), covering version 1.1.53. This limited, self-selected sample is not representative; player reports are not independently verified.

DOP 5: Delete One Part turns subtraction into the solution. Rub away part of an illustration to answer its question, reveal a hidden situation, or make the scene resolve.

The answer is a change to the picture

You use a finger as an eraser, deciding which object—or which section of one—to remove. The description emphasizes interpreting the scene before erasing rather than deleting randomly. Some problems are meant to be obvious, while others require a less literal reading.

The developer advertises hundreds of scenarios, a help button, and experimentation without a penalty for a wrong first attempt. That gives the concept a playful-riddle character rather than the fixed constraints of Sudoku. The central quality question is whether the reveal feels like a satisfying answer to the prompt.

Humor and challenge have supporters

Reviewers in this sample praise the act of erasing and the mixture of funny or surprising scenes. One enjoys the challenge, while another says a particular early level was difficult. Those experiences can coexist: a collection of unrelated visual riddles need not produce a perfectly smooth difficulty ladder.

Some praise is deliberately exuberant or brief. It should not be stretched into evidence of learning benefits, superior logic design, or reliable performance. Similarly, a standalone claim of a virus is not proof that the app itself infected a device.

Ads and family suitability deserve separate checks

Multiple accounts describe advertising after levels or after attempts, even while saying they enjoy the game. A contrasting review simply reports no ads. The sample does not explain that disagreement or establish a single ad schedule.

More consequential for families are reports of inappropriate ad material and suggestive scenes. These are specific player concerns, not independently inspected content findings. They are nevertheless a reason not to treat the listing’s broad appeal to young and old as a guarantee that every scene and ad suits a child.

The US download is free. The supplied material does not establish current ad-removal terms, hint pricing, or offline support. An enjoyable erasing trick is therefore distinct from the decision to leave a child with the app unsupervised.

Consider DOP 5 if you like visual jokes and lateral-thinking reveals. Skip it if you want formal deduction, consistent rules across every puzzle, or independently verified child-appropriate presentation.

Verdict

DOP 5 has an understandable comic-riddle appeal, with real supporters of its erasing mechanic. Advertising friction and reported content concerns are substantial caveats, especially for families.

FAQ

How do you solve DOP 5 puzzles?

Erase the part of an illustration that answers the scene’s question or reveals the intended solution.

Are mistakes penalized?

The developer says you can try ideas without a penalty for an incorrect first attempt. That claim has not been tested here.

Is DOP 5 suitable for children?

Some sampled reviewers report inappropriate ads or suggestive scenes. Suitability should not be assumed from the playful artwork alone.

US App Store listing.

Testing boundaries

No hands-on gameplay, advertising, purchase, offline, or stability testing.

Scores, dimension by dimension

Gameplay, fairness, content, and stability use the default 7.0. Ads uses a store-evidence sample when one exists, otherwise the same default. None of these numbers is a playtest measurement.

G
7.0

Gameplay 30%

Screenshot impression 7.5/10: Erasing the guard’s arm to reveal a tattoo and find the cheater makes the delete-one-part gag clear. Default score 7.0. This dimension was not playtested, and the default is what the ranking uses.

A
6.5

Ads 20%

The US App Store lists a remove-ads purchase: No ads ($1.99). Forced ads were not playtested, so the no-forced-ads tag stays unknown. The store lists a remove-ads purchase, so Ads is drawn from 4.5–6.5. Sampled Ads score 6.5. Not a playtest.

F
7.0

Fairness 20%

The US App Store lists in-app purchases: No ads ($1.99). Whether any purchase is required to keep playing was not playtested. Default score 7.0. This dimension was not playtested, and the default is what the ranking uses.

C
7.0

Content 15%

Store content note: The store describes it as “level progression.” The store page does not clearly state a fail state. Default score 7.0. This dimension was not playtested, and the default is what the ranking uses.

U
7.0

Stability 15%

Stability was not played. Age rating shown on the store is 4+. App version on the listing is 1.1.53. Default score 7.0. This dimension was not playtested, and the default is what the ranking uses.

App Store screenshots

DOP 5: Delete One Part official App Store screenshot: An illustrated club entrance and characters beneath the prompt Find a cheater, with an eraser gesture.
App Store screenshot 1
DOP 5: Delete One Part official App Store screenshot 2.
App Store screenshot 2
DOP 5: Delete One Part official App Store screenshot 3.
App Store screenshot 3
App Store screenshots. Not playtest captures.

Quick answers

How do you solve DOP 5 puzzles?

Erase the part of an illustration that answers the scene’s question or reveals the intended solution.

Are mistakes penalized?

The developer says you can try ideas without a penalty for an incorrect first attempt. That claim has not been tested here.

Is DOP 5 suitable for children?

Some sampled reviewers report inappropriate ads or suggestive scenes. Suitability should not be assumed from the playful artwork alone.