Brain Test 2: Tricky Stories review

Brain Test 2: Tricky Stories gives visual riddles a continuing cast. Its documented distinction is the movement from isolated brainteasers toward sequences involving characters and their situations. This source-based analysis uses the US App Store listing, not hands-on play.

Follow a situation, then challenge the obvious answer

The listing names stories involving Tom the cat, Emily's farm, and Joe facing monsters. The player works through puzzles connected to those scenarios rather than a purely abstract grid or number exercise.

The developer emphasizes unconventional answers and thinking beyond an initial assumption. That suggests a challenge of interpretation: the apparent action may not be the one that resolves the scene.

The supplied description does not establish every gesture or solution mechanic. It would be inappropriate to prescribe shaking a device, combining particular objects, or using multi-touch without evidence for those actions in this app.

Story continuity can support the puzzle habit

Returning characters can provide a reason to continue even when the individual puzzles are short. A player who wants a small narrative payoff may prefer that to an endless list of unrelated questions.

Someone seeking a strict logical ruleset may be less comfortable with the open-ended idea of a trick answer. If the intended interpretation is unclear, recognizing what the designer wants can become as important as reasoning about the situation itself.

Those are potential design tradeoffs, not player complaints. No usable review bodies are available in this collection. The evidence does not support statements about whether players find the riddles fair, hilarious, repetitive, or too easy.

Offline and subscription language need separate treatment

The listing advertises offline play. That does not independently establish that every story, event, or assistance feature is available without a connection.

The text also includes subscription-cancellation language, but does not fully specify a current plan or price. It should not be used to invent a weekly amount or describe a particular entitlement. The US metadata records a free download, which is separate from optional recurring access.

Advertising frequency, removal terms, stability, and device-transfer behavior are not established by the supplied evidence. A cartoon presentation and short puzzles do not settle those practical questions or establish suitability for every age.

Verdict

Brain Test 2 is most relevant to players who enjoy character-led visual riddles and are comfortable with unconventional interpretations. It is a weaker fit for someone seeking predictable deduction rules or a fully documented free-content model. The connected stories are its clearest attraction; actual puzzle quality and access conditions remain untested.

FAQ

Are the puzzles connected by stories? Yes. The listing names several continuing character scenarios.

Is this a conventional numerical brain trainer? The emphasis is on visual situations and tricky interpretations, not a documented arithmetic curriculum.

Is offline play advertised? Yes, though its complete scope was not independently tested.

Is a subscription price confirmed? No. Cancellation language appears, but a full current plan and price are not established.

View the official US App Store listing · How evidence differs from playtesting