G
7.0
Gameplay 30%
Gameplay was not playtested. Default score 7.0. This dimension was not playtested, and the default is what the ranking uses.
Home / Reviews / paint-by-number / Art Color - Color by Number
FULL REVIEW REVIEW DIGEST
Art Color - Color by Number review
Art Color has supporters of its imagery and automatic color changes, but lost-progress reports directly affect its central activity. Ambiguous Premium wording and video unlock failures deserve attention before committing money or a long unfinished page.
Opens the official store and leaves this site. Kids: ask a grown-up before buying anything.
Player-review analysis, not a playtest. Sources: the US App Store listing and 50 US reviews dated 2023-10-29–2026-10-19 (Asia/Shanghai), covering versions 2.2.1–2.4.8. This limited, self-selected sample is not representative; player reports are not independently verified.
Art Color - Color by Number fills predefined numbered regions rather than asking you to draw a picture from scratch. Its catalog includes animals, food, mandalas, and fantasy subjects, with new pages advertised daily.
A finished image is built from small targets
The official image shows a brightly colored fantasy portrait, small numbered areas, and a numbered color palette. Choosing the corresponding color and filling its regions is the documented activity.
One reviewer likes automatic color switching. Another prefers the simple pictures, while a contrasting account finds the artwork a little too easy and wants more challenge.
A more recent detailed supporter still struggles to locate tiny spots. Another says hints do not zoom to the desired number. These concerns are about finding the final region, not necessarily the quality of the completed artwork.
Saving work is central to a coloring app
Several historical reviewers describe returning to an unfinished picture and finding progress lost. A January 2026 account reports the same basic experience, so it cannot be treated only as a resolved early-version complaint.
These are unverified reports, not a finding that all pictures fail to save. An October 2026 reviewer revises an earlier low opinion and now calls it a favorite, without specifically confirming a save-system repair.
A 2023 updated complaint acknowledges developer suggestions and an update’s claimed fix but says the video-access problem remained. A promise or suggested remedy should not become a verified recovery.
Free-page and Premium claims conflict
The description says all pages are free with no hidden fees, then says Premium unlocks all pictures and removes ads and watermarks. Those statements do not establish a coherent universal free-access rule.
Its subscription paragraph also conflicts internally: it names a weekly offer but calls a $9.99 renewal monthly before again stating $9.99 weekly. A $49.99 yearly figure is separately quoted. Current billing cadence must be checked at checkout rather than chosen by editorial guesswork.
Video unlocks need functioning delivery
Reviewers report ad videos failing to load for desired pictures or not supplying hints. Another historical account reports no commercials, while others object to ad length or content. No universal frequency or child-safe advertising verdict follows.
The listing explicitly qualifies offline coloring: download pages in advance. That is not immediate access to every image without connectivity.
The US download is free. Consider Art Color for its pictured palette-led art, while giving save continuity, tiny-region visibility, and unclear subscription wording particular weight.
Verdict
Art Color has supporters of its imagery and automatic color changes, but lost-progress reports directly affect its central activity. Ambiguous Premium wording and video unlock failures deserve attention before committing money or a long unfinished page.
FAQ
Can you color offline?
The developer says previously downloaded pages support offline coloring; that behavior was not independently tested.
Is $9.99 definitely weekly or monthly?
The supplied text uses both cadences inconsistently. Current checkout terms are required to resolve it.
Did the latest positive review confirm saving was fixed?
No. It revises an overall opinion without specifically confirming a save-system repair.
Testing boundaries
No hands-on gameplay, advertising, purchase, offline, or stability testing.
Scores, dimension by dimension
A
7.0
Ads 20%
Ads were not playtested, and this game has no separate store-ad sample. The no-forced-ads tag stays unknown. Default score 7.0. This dimension was not playtested, and the default is what the ranking uses.
F
7.0
Fairness 20%
Whether a purchase is required to keep playing was not playtested. Default score 7.0. This dimension was not playtested, and the default is what the ranking uses.
C
7.0
Content 15%
Content depth was not playtested. Default score 7.0. This dimension was not playtested, and the default is what the ranking uses.
U
7.0
Stability 15%
Stability was not playtested. Default score 7.0. This dimension was not playtested, and the default is what the ranking uses.
App Store screenshots
Quick answers
Can you color offline?
The developer says previously downloaded pages support offline coloring; that behavior was not independently tested.
Is $9.99 definitely weekly or monthly?
The supplied text uses both cadences inconsistently. Current checkout terms are required to resolve it.
Did the latest positive review confirm saving was fixed?
No. It revises an overall opinion without specifically confirming a save-system repair.